Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
SOSLIB 162 #29034 31 Jan 11 02:08 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,645
J
Jack McGregor Online Content OP
Member
OP Online Content
Member
J
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,645
FYI, the SOSLIB has been updated, taking us to revision 162. The preferred way to update is to LOG DSK0:[901,2] and then RUN SOSUPD, which uses the UpdateCenter to download just the files that have changed.

Release notes are at: soslib.html

I have not created a zip version, but other than that, you may want to read the notes associated with the prior SOSLIB 151 update (in this forum) for general information about the SOSLIB.

Re: SOSLIB 162 #29035 31 Jan 11 04:00 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 153
O
OmniLedger - Tom Reynolds Offline
Member
Offline
Member
O
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 153
Missing file?

31-Jan-11 09:47:54 Checking for SOSLIB updates...
31-Jan-11 09:47:55 Adding bldzip.cmd: cur: , -1 bytes; new: 2010-05-04 14:37:2
31-Jan-11 09:47:56 Error downloading bldzip.cmd
31-Jan-11 09:48:02 Creating PPN: /vm/miame/dsk0/907045
31-Jan-11 09:48:02 Adding start.cmd: cur: , -1 bytes; new: 2010-05-11 15:31:2,

Barry

Re: SOSLIB 162 #29036 31 Jan 11 11:45 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,645
J
Jack McGregor Online Content OP
Member
OP Online Content
Member
J
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,645
Hmmm...

Not yet sure what to make of that. I was able to download it ok from the Windows side, which accesses the same repository. (Although I did run into a problem with it failing to display the release notes in XTEXT which I'm looking into, but that's unrelated to your situation.)

When I tried it on one of my Linux systems, it looked pretty normal:

Code
.RUN SOSUPD                                                 
                                                            
SOSLIB Update 2.1(117)                                      
Checking for SOSLIB updates...                              
Creating PPN: /vm/miame/dsk0/908052                         
New: uspstst.bp[908,052]                                    
New: start.cmd[908,052]                                     
New: delmnu1.bp[908,035]                                    
New: delmnu2.bp[908,035]                                    
New: xtra15.bp[908,021]                                     
Updated: ateapx.sbx[907,006] 1.0(118)                       
Updated: ateins.sbx[907,006] 2.0(106)                       
New: strrpl.bsi[907,010]                                    
Updated: inix.sbx[907,031] 5.0(509)                         
Operation complete;  9 files updated.                       
                                                            
See OPR:SOSUPD.TRC and OPR:SOSUPD.LOG for trace/log details 
.                                                 
Of course that wasn't a fair test because bldzip.cmd[908,48] was already up to date. So I erase it and tried again:

Code
.erase bldzip.cmd[908,48]
Total of 1 file delete, 1 disk block freed.
.run sosupd
SOSLIB Update 2.1(117)                                     
Checking for SOSLIB updates...                             
New: bldzip.cmd[908,048]                                   
Operation complete;  1 file updated.                       
                                                  
See OPR:SOSUPD.TRC and OPR:SOSUPD.LOG for trace/log details
That seems ok too.

And I can't come up with any particular reason for it to single out that file, other than perhaps there was some kind of network problem at the point which wasn't handled as well as it could have been. Does it work when you RUN SOSUPD again?

Actually, I did just remember that there was a problem in an older version of the Fn'HttpGet() function which caused it to fail with extremely small files. So perhaps if you were running an older version of SOSUPD.RUN, which failed to update itself first (that logic was only added in the most recent SOSUPD version - edit 117), then perhaps that would explain it. (And re-running it would work, because on the second go-around, you would be running the latest SOSUPD.RUN.) Or at least that's a theory.

For what it's worth (which may not be much, unless the ISAM file of US zip codes is interesting to you), if you just want the missing file, here's an alternate copy: BLDZIP.CMD

Re: SOSLIB 162 #29037 01 Feb 11 03:56 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 153
O
OmniLedger - Tom Reynolds Offline
Member
Offline
Member
O
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 153
Repeated SOSUPD before I posted the previous message as I noticed, but wasn't quick enough to read the error.

However I have just tried again and it's fine now...

SOSLIB Update 2.1(117)
Checking for SOSLIB updates...
New: bldzip.cmd[908,048]
Updated: sbxinp.sbx[907,037] 2.3(1)
Updated: sbxinp.sbx[907,006] 2.3(1)
Operation complete; 3 files updated.

Barry


Moderated by  Jack McGregor, Ty Griffin 

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3